That
statement presents a Catch 22, a conundrum, if you will.
We
live in a capitalistic society. Capitalism is defined as “an
economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of
capital goods, by investments that are determined by private
decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods
that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.”
Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
More
simply stated, we the consumers have choices and in most cases, with
the exception of certain monopolies, we actually control the economy
and whether certain businesses succeed or fail. That's pretty awesome
power. And, as with virtually everything else in life, there are
advantages and disadvantages, benefits and abuses with this kind of
system.
We
live in a Democratic-Republic, as far as the governmental facet of
the U.S. society. That means (or is supposed to mean) that the
government operates under the power and authority of the citizens
(democratic), but laws and day to day operation of the government is
delegated to elected officials elected by the citizens to transact
the business of government for the citizens. It's not my intention to
make this a civics lesson or talk politics. I'm simply stating the
definitions.
China
has also embraced a Capitalistic economic system. It hasn't always
been that way. China became a country operating under the Communist
governmental model in October 1949 defined as “a
way of organizing a society in which the government owns the things
that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil,
factories, ships, etc.) and there is no privately owned property.”
Additionally, in most Communist countries, the citizens don't own
homes, they are assigned where they will live. They are assigned jobs
and paid what the government chooses to pay, etc.
Until
the later 80's and beginning of the 90's, China didn't embrace the
Capitalistic economic model. When the Communist government realized
how huge the economy was in tiny Hong Kong, a small chunk of China
that had been under British control for 150 years, the People's
Republic began converting their own economy. One small town across
the border from Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 1979 population 30,000, became
China's answer to Hong Kong. It was estimated at one time 97% of all
the construction cranes in the world were busy building Shenzhen into
what is now a commercial, manufacturing city of over 10,000,000
people. The Chinese economy ultimately exploded under Capitalism and
became a world economic power, now second only to the U.S., passing
Japan, Germany and Great Britain. Hong Kong reverted to China in 1997
adding to that exploding economy.
When
I visited China in the summer of 1990, the Chinese interpreter/guide
on the bus I was riding on apologized for a minor traffic jam because
he said, “now that Beijing has 20,000 motor vehicles, they have
traffic jams.” There are currently an estimated 6 million motor
vehicles in Beijing. Quite an increase in only 26 years. The
difference is, of course, the Capitalistic economy that has grown by
awesome magnitudes.
To
Consume or Not To Consume
Back
to my original statement. We each have choices to make. We can buy
and consume any of the untold number of millions of items available
in this free market system. Or, we can choose to be a minimalist and
buy and consume only that which we actually need. I can tell you
categorically, no one needs everything. That helps simplify the
buy/consume choices.
The
Catch 22 or conundrum is also simple. If somebody doesn't buy and
consume something, businesses (large and small) will ultimately fail
and go out of business. This means a few, tens, hundreds or even
thousands of people will lose their jobs, be unemployed and have no
money to even buy and consume the absolute basic necessities of life.
To put it another way, the entire economic system will eventually
collapse and we could potentially be living under a Communist system
and/or the world could turn into a “Mad Max” (the movie)
scenario.
It
is a Catch 22. If you buy lots of “stuff,” you end up with little
left in the way of personal financial resources or, worse yet, in
debt up to your ears with lots of “stuff” you need to store (or
warehouse – spawning another new business, private rental storage
units that cost you more money for “stuff” that is constantly
depreciating and actually becoming obsolete and worthless). But, you
are supporting the Capitalistic economy. Raise the flag. Hip! Hip!
On
the other hand, IF, like a growing segment of the population, you
become a minimalist, you may ultimately, along with others embracing
a minimalist philosophy, could actually be instrumental in causing
businesses and even entire industries to fail, leaving vacant
offices, stores and factories to mention a few. Has your personal
philosophy to buy less and only what you and your family actually
need to live comfortably become “unAmerican?” Will you be
ostracized for being a minimalist?
You
see the problem here, don't you? You're sort of damned if you do buy
into the massive consumerism/materialistic Capitalistic mentality or
you're damned if you don't.
Hey!
Here's another thought what if it's your industry that fails or your
small business and you're one of the people put out of work and on
the street? Think about all the buggy whip makers, the vinyl record
pressing plant employees, the Studebaker auto workers, the
agricultural workers and the list can go on nearly endlessly, who
have been put out of work because people no longer needed or wanted
their products or couldn't afford the products due to obsolete
technology.
Personally,
I liked some of Studebaker's auto designs. And, there was a certain
amount of negative impact I had on the vinyl record industry when I
ran my high-speed audio cassette duplication businesses. Of course,
then the CD came in and negatively impacted the audio cassette. And
the online digital streaming and download industry has had a negative
impact on the CD. Oh yeah, and there are no more Pontiacs,
Oldsmobiles, Saturns, Mercurys, DeSotos, Plymouths and a number of
other brands and kinds of products.
The
Cigarette, Alcohol and Prescription Drug Industries
Here
are three questions for you. I'm not moralizing or criticizing
anyone. I'm simply asking yes or no questions.
- Does anyone NEED to smoke cigarettes?
- Does anyone NEED to drink alcoholic beverages?
- Does anyone NEED all kinds of prescription drugs?
The
obvious answer to the first two questions is NO! These are 100%
voluntary personal choices. The answer to number three is a
qualified maybe. It's scientifically proven fact that cigarettes and
alcohol are addictive substances and a significant number of people
will become addicted to them typically resulting in negative impacts
to the individual and, often, those around them including family,
friends, employees and customers/clients.
Prescription
drugs are a slightly different story. They are prescribed by your
trusted healthcare provider. So, they can't be wrong, right? Wrong?
Just because you see it advertised on TV or in a magazine and your
doctor prescribes it doesn't mean you NEED it. As a matter of fact, I
watched a commercial on TV the other night and had my stopwatch
ready. It was for, yet, another new drug for some specific thing. I
started the stopwatch at the beginning of the 1 minute commercial. At
about 20 seconds into the commercial the disclaimers, side effects,
possible negative impacts this drug could have on someone taking it
took up the rest of the 60 seconds, ending with “Ask your doctor if
XXXXXXX is right for you?”
Often,
these drugs may have some positive results for you, but you also lose
some quality of life due to the side effects. So, the doctor then
prescribes another drug or two or more to counter the side effects of
the first drug. Then there may be side effects from the secondary
drugs that require other drugs to counteract those side effects.
There are actually people, typically in their senior years, who may
have as many as 40 or more prescriptions. They have to take them
everyday in a specific prescribed order and time. So, what happened
to quality of life?
Am
I making a point here? BUT, there is another side of the coin. IF we
flat out stopped smoking and closed all cigarette businesses, how
would that impact the economy. The domino effect is far reaching and
staggering. Just to mention a few industries that would be directly
impacted – agriculture, shipping, energy (fuel), energy
(utilities), cigarette machinery manufacturers, plant and grounds
maintenance, chemical, paper, printing, ink, wholesale distributors,
retailers, healthcare, chemo therapy drug manufacturers, radiology
equipment manufacturers, wig makers, cosmetic manufacturers and these
are only the major players.
Few
people ever follow the trail to see where all those dominoes lead.
The same is true for the alcohol industry. And the pharmaceutical
industry is probably even more far reaching.
Being
a consumer is an awesome responsibility. A responsibility few people
imagine. But, by the same token, being a wise, frugal and
conservative (minimalist) consumer is just as important and
responsible.
How
many people NEED a Ferrari? They currently range in price from a low
of $188,000.00 to an estimated top end of $400,000.00. Guess what? If
you need to run to the local supermarket for a few groceries, a Ford
Focus – around $20,000 will do exactly the same job.
How
many RVers NEED a $130,000 Sprinter Class B motorhome? How many need
a 45', custom-built, Prevost bus conversion that may cost from a low
of $1,500,000.00 to $3,000,000.00 or more?
You
can dream up more examples if you'd like. The basic answer is NOT
MANY! It would be my guess that in the entire world, perhaps 1% of
the 7.4 billion population or about 74,000,000 people (and probably
only about 10% of those) are really in the market for those kinds of
things. The mark-ups are astronomical on those kinds of items. They
are not practical for the 99% plus of people in the world, so – WHO
CARES who buys and wants them.
The
Choices Are All Ours
So,
let's get realistic. You and I are not going to put any of these
businesses out of business. We're not going to impact them enough to
cause massive layoffs. We're not going to cause a domino effect
collapse of the economy. But, if we continue to choose to succumb to
the 5,000 plus consumerism marketing messages we're bombarded with
every single day, we will be the ones who are bankrupted –
financially, morally and even our health.
The
Capitalistic system and economy is fantastic. It actually does give
us so many choices. If we want to live a minimalist lifestyle and be
happier and freer with less stuff weighing us down, we must learn
what our real and actual NEEDS are. The we must put our blinders on
and turn off the incessant, never ending babble that goes on 24/7 on
the home shopping channels. Then we must carefully select the
vendors, whether online or brick and mortar stores, become informed
consumers and don't buy all the hype fed to you by another major
industry of the Capitalistic system – marketing (and it's evil
twin, advertising).
I'm
not suggesting it's a sin to have some wants for a few luxuries or
special items that just make you feel good. I'm not into sack cloth,
ashes and eating rice and porridge in the pot nine days old. I'm
saying a smart minimalist can live a very satisfying, fulfilling,
free and happy lifestyle just by making good, informed decisions
whether to consume or not to consume.
I
am as bad as the next person. While I've generally been frugal and
pragmatic throughout my lifetime, I was still a consumer. I ended up
with way more than I ever really needed. That is a main reason why
I'm still working at clearing out a rental storage unit – yep, I'm
guilty.
Several
years ago I started asking myself a simple question whenever I walked
the aisles of Costco, Walmart, Kohls or perusing offerings from the
numerous daily online feeds I receive. The question is: “Can I live
without this?” I then put myself on a 30 day cooling off period for
any item I was really drawn to. The result? I can honestly say 99.9%
of everything I look at never becomes a possession of mine. It may
become someone else's, but not mine.
One
day in the future I might see one of these items in a flea market,
yard sale, thrift store or on eBay at a fraction of the original
cost. Maybe, and that's only a very slight maybe, I might be drawn to
the item again. I ask the same question and repeat the process.
Buying
stuff can be and often is an addiction, just like smoking, drinking
alcohol, drugs, gambling, etc. Break that (and any other unhealthy)
addictions you have to live free and be happy. EH
4 comments:
Excellent article.
@short comment in regard of:
Alcohol...do I need it, heck NO !
Cigarettes..do I need them, heck NO!
Prescription drugs...UNFORTUNETLY yes, I need a statin for my elevated cholesterol, Atenolol for an elevated B/P & dialtazem for angina, it means, if I don't take them, I'll be dead meat, SO sometimes we have NO CHOICE than to become consumers to the pharmaceutical business.
Love your blog.
Thanks! You see my point. We have choices. Put another way, we can choose our poisons. No one is immune. The the magic word is choices. we can choose any of the three (and a bazillion more) choices. Each has some kind of consequence. In the case of prescription drugs, you have a choice, but the one you have made is the right one for you and you're not abusing it. You're using is intelligently to maintain your health and prolong your life. The other two, well, there are no real lifesaving benefits to them and you choose to avoid consuming them. I would classify this as making intelligent, sound choices for your lifestyle. But, as you know. There are many people who abuse the life saving, life enhancing drugs. Once they cross that line, they are in no better a situation than abusing their bodies with alcohol or cigarettes. The line has been crossed. But, we're each blessed with "free will." How we exercise our free will can make all the difference in the world for quality of life.
I appreciate your compliment about the blog. It's my mission to make a small, positive contribution to our society.
Live free & be happy,
Ed
Really enjoyed this article and all of your articles. What an inspiration they (you) are.
Thanks again.
Thank you for your kind words, Matt. I'm glad to know you gained from my words. That is why I write.
I looked at your blog and it is a real heart rending subject. I can see you have dealt with some real pain in your life. I have a (nearly) 39 year old son who is the Apple of my eye, but we spend most of our time a continent apart. Only because he chooses to live where he does and trek the world and I live on the road as a nomad most of my time and trek the US. But we both have a deep love and respect for one another. I hope your situation heals with your daughter.
Post a Comment